Bling Economics and Vampires
October 28th, 2008They want us to shop. Retailers have been preying on our snail and cyber mailboxes with discount coupons, codes, and extended-day sales trying to, as True Blood’s Sookie Stackhouse would say, glamour us. Instead turn your gaze away, be brave and fathom the dark recesses of your closets. Dig deep within those drawers and dusty boxes. What’s a little sneezing and lint in your hair? Re-discovering long lost jewelry can really be fun. However, that is only if it still works for you. Owning things you cannot wear makes little sense. These are difficult times, and this is bling economics.
In Alan Ball’s libido-driven and deranged plot lines, vampires don’t usually mess around with emotion. To put it plainly: they eat and run. You should view your jewelry the same way. The weight of sentimental value can be heavy; still, if it doesn’t help nourish you in one way or another, then ask yourself, what is its purpose? Parting with a family heirloom requires much consideration, but letting go of broken or ill-fitting pieces is easy and great idea. It’s a smart time to sell cast-offs rather than permitting them to languish at the bottom of a drawer.
If only to give peripheral meaning to my watching True Blood, I wish one of Ball’s vampires would flash a mysterious little jewel. Remember the late 1960s campy, low-production-value Dark Shadows? Barnabus Collins’ ring possessed magical powers. Loved that stagy bit o’ bling. The center gem was a bloodstone, if I recall correctly. Which makes sense…at least for a vampire.

